Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42463710›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An informed regression-based knowledge distillation framework for simultaneous prediction of physical and mechanical properties of thermoset epoxy polymers.

B S Sindu, Jan Hamaekers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

B S SinduSpecial and Multifunctional Structures Laboratory, CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, Taramani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600113, India.
Jan HamaekersFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing SCAI, Schloss Birlinghoven, 53757, Sankt Augustin, Germany. jan.hamaekers@scai.fraunhofer.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-043X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epoxy polymers are widely used due to their multifunctional properties, however their complex 3D molecular structure, multi-component nature, and lack of curated datasets have limited the application of machine learning (ML) for these materials.Existing ML studies are largely restricted to simulation data, specific properties, or narrow constituent ranges. To address these limitations, we developed an Informed Regression-based Knowledge Distillation (R-KD) framework for predicting multiple physical (glass transition temperature, density) and mechanical properties (elastic modulus, tensile strength, flexural strength, adhesive strength) of thermoset epoxy polymers. The model was trained on experimental literature data covering diverse monomer classes (9 resins, 37 hardeners). The best-performing single-task regression model per target property serves as teacher model capturing nonlinear feature-property relationships, while a unified neural network student model learns distilled knowledge across all properties simultaneously. By encoding the target property as an input feature, the student model leverages cross-property correlations. Molecular-level descriptors extracted from SMILES representations using RDKit create a physics-informed model. Comparative analysis demonstrates superior or comparable prediction accuracy over multi-task NN baseline model and conventional ML models. Simultaneous multi-property prediction further improves accuracy through information sharing across correlated properties. The proposed framework enables accelerated design of novel epoxy polymers with tailored properties.

Identifiers

PMID42463710
PMCPMC13376364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.