Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42463694›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2026

Comparing feedback learning and arousal responses in Down, Fragile X, and Williams syndromes.

Astrid E Z Hallman, Charlotte Willfors, Matilda A Frick, Ann Nordgren, Johan Lundin Kleberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Astrid E Z HallmanDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. astrid.hallman@su.se.
Charlotte WillforsDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Matilda A FrickDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ann NordgrenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan Lundin KlebergDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms underlying feedback learning in intellectual disability (ID) remain poorly understood. Down syndrome (DS), Fragile X syndrome (FXS), and Williams syndrome (WS) are genetic syndromes associated with ID, with distinct attention and arousal regulation profiles. Pupil dilation is a well-established index of feedback processing in typical development; little is known about these processes in non-social learning in these syndromes. Participants with DS (n = 13), FXS (n = 13), WS (n = 27), and typically developing (TD) individuals (n = 56) aged 6-60 years completed a reward contingency reversal task while eye-tracking recorded pupil dilation and gaze allocation. Data were analyzed using Bayesian mixed-effects models. All groups effectively learned from feedback, staying with rewarded options and switching after losses. WS participants performed similarly to TD participants. DS and FXS individuals showed more variable behavioral performance, indicating potential individual differences in feedback processing that warrant further investigation. Physiologically, TD individuals showed greater pupil dilation following losses than wins, whereas WS individuals showed no difference, suggesting attenuated physiological sensitivity to feedback valence. All groups tended to fixate on the previously rewarded options. This research highlights the value of combining behavioral and physiological approaches in ID research.

Identifiers

PMID42463694
PMCPMC13377110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.