ArticleGeroScience2026
Auditory and executive determinants of phonetic processing and lexical acquisition in older adults with mild hearing impairment and cognitive decline.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related pure-tone hearing loss (HL) frequently co-occurs with central auditory processing deficits and cognitive decline and is commonly associated with speech processing difficulties. To examine how inter-individual differences in central auditory processing and cognitive capacities contribute to speech processing and lexical acquisition, we investigated the neural encoding and acquisition of novel words using phonetic stimuli as a proxy for speech processing abilities. These stimuli were presented at 80 dB SPL to minimize audibility-related confounds and ensure that differences in learning were not primarily driven by peripheral hearing sensitivity. Older adults with mild-to-moderate peripheral HL and signs of cognitive decline (N = 21) completed an attentive listening and associative word learning task with Thai words while EEG was recorded, alongside comprehensive psychometric, audiometric, and auditory assessments. Neural markers of word learning were preserved in this population, as reflected in the N400 and late positive component (LPC) event-related potentials (ERPs), with LPC amplitudes predicting word learning performance. Multiple linear regression models controlling for age and HL examined whether sensory ERPs (P50, N100, P200), behavioral auditory-audiometric measures (OLSA, PTA 4000, d-primes for attentive listening), or cognitive variables (attention, language, memory, perception, executive function, n-back, Stroop) predicted learning outcomes. Age accounted for the largest proportion of variance in word learning performance. Sensory ERPs and cognitive measures also emerged as significant predictors, whereas, as expected given the high stimulus intensity, peripheral HL showed a non-significant effect. Larger N100 amplitudes explained variance in sensory ERP models, while executive functions were the strongest predictors in cognitive models. Superior word learning performance was associated with younger age, enhanced central auditory processing, and stronger executive functions. These findings indicate that central auditory processing and executive functions are key determinants of speech learning in older adults with mild-to-moderate peripheral HL and cognitive decline when audibility is controlled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42463613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.