ArticleGeroScience2026
Adherence to the Eatwell Guide and associations with markers of physical function: a prospective analysis within the UK Biobank cohort.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Eatwell Guide represents the UK's principal healthy eating model and understanding whether adherence to UK dietary recommendations can attenuate age-related functional decline is essential to inform healthy ageing strategies. In up to 157,457 participants from the UK Biobank, we explored cross-sectional and prospective associations between adherence to the Eatwell Guide and markers of physical function (grip strength, fat-free mass percentage, self-reported walking pace, and falls). Eatwell Guide adherence scores were derived from 24-h dietary recall data (Oxford WebQ), and quantified using a graded, food-based scoring system. Differences between population subgroups including by age, sex, physical activity, and protein intake level were explored. Higher Eatwell Guide adherence was cross-sectionally associated with higher grip strength, greater fat-free mass percentage, higher odds of brisk walking pace, and lower odds of falls (all p < 0.001). Prospectively, greater adherence was associated with attenuated fat-free mass decline (β = 0.02, SE = 0.001, p < 0.001) and slower grip strength decline (β = 0.01, SE = 0.002, p < 0.01). For walking pace, the positive cross-sectional association attenuated over follow-up (EWG × time interaction OR = 0.998, 95% CI 0.997-0.999, p = 0.002), whereas the protective association with falls remained stable over time (OR = 1.000, 95% CI 0.998-1.000, p = 0.89). Higher Eatwell Guide adherence was associated with preserved muscle mass, modest attenuation of grip strength decline over time, and a reduced risk of falls, supporting its relevance for musculoskeletal health and physical function in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42463612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.