Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42463593›Full record

ReviewDiscover nano2026

A comparative review of the adsorption efficiency and performance variances of metal oxide nanoparticles and pristine carbon nanotubes for Pb

Samuel Nnadi, Ifeanyi A Ucheana, Stanley U Nwoke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel NnadiDepartment of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Ifeanyi A UcheanaDepartment of Nuclear Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Stanley U NwokeCentral Science Laboratory, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria. Stanley.nwoke@unn.edu.ng.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lead (Pb²⁺) contamination in aquatic systems poses a major threat to human health and environmental safety. Conventional remediation techniques such as chemical precipitation and ion exchange are often constrained by high operational costs, poor efficiency at trace concentrations, and secondary pollution. Nanotechnology has introduced materials like carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs) with superior physicochemical reactivity for Pb²⁺ removal. This review highlights recent advances (2002-2025) in adsorption-desorption behaviour of Pb²⁺ on MONPs and pristine CNTs, focusing on synthesis, surface properties, adsorption mechanisms, reusability, and toxicity. Reported findings reveal that MONPs, including Fe₃O₄, ZnO, MgO, and CuO, exhibit outstanding adsorption capacities (up to 1980 mg g⁻¹ for MgONPs), surpassing those of CNTs which usually range between 10 and 250 mg g

Indexed as

AdsorptionCNTsDesorptionMONPsRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID42463593
PMCPMC13376077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.