Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42463578›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026

Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Strategies Following Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using Real-World Registry Data.

Edward Dababneh, Maria Gabriela Matta, Ajay Sinhal, Selvanayagam Niranjan, Sylvio Provenzano, Anthony Camuglia, Ian Hughes, Kuljit Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edward Dababneh *Department of Cardiology, Gold Coast Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8947-2963
Maria Gabriela Matta *Department of Cardiology, Gold Coast Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Ajay SinhalDepartment of Cardiology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Selvanayagam NiranjanDepartment of Cardiology, Gold Coast Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Sylvio ProvenzanoDepartment of Cardiology, Gold Coast Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Anthony CamugliaDepartment of Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolangabba, QLD, Australia.
Ian HughesDepartment of Cardiology, Gold Coast Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Kuljit SinghDepartment of Cardiology, Gold Coast Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. kjaulakh@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a less invasive alternative to redo surgery for failed surgical bioprostheses, but optimal antithrombotic management is uncertain.

objectivesTo compare outcomes across antithrombotic regimens after valve-in-valve procedures in real-world practice.

methodsIn the Australasian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (2018-2025), 1,050 adults were grouped by discharge regimen: single antiplatelet therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, oral anticoagulation, or oral anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy. Outcomes included 30-day and 12-month mortality, stroke/TIA, life-threatening or major bleeding, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and echocardiographic valve performance.

resultsThirty-day mortality was higher with oral anticoagulation (1.7%) and combination therapy (3.6%) than with single or dual antiplatelet therapy (both 0%; p < 0.001). The 30-day MACCE rate was greater with oral anticoagulation (4.5%) and combination therapy (4.4%) than with single (1.5%) or dual antiplatelet therapy (0.4%) (p = 0.003); stroke/TIA and bleeding were infrequent and similar across groups. At 12 months, MACCE remained highest with oral anticoagulation (11.8%) and combination therapy (10.7%) compared with single (5.0%) and dual antiplatelet therapy (3.2%) (p = 0.001). Mortality at 12 months was numerically higher with oral anticoagulation or combination therapy (5.2% and 4.4%) than with single or dual antiplatelet therapy (1.8% and 2.4%) (p = 0.116). At 30 days, transvalvular gradients were lower in patients receiving oral anticoagulation-containing regimens; however, no significant differences in gradients, valve area, ejection fraction, or regurgitation were observed at 12 months. In multivariable analysis, combination therapy was independently associated with higher odds of 12-month MACCE compared with SAPT (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.03-7.37; p = 0.043). Higher STS score and greater frailty were also independently associated with 12-month MACCE.

conclusionsIn this observational cohort of patients undergoing valve-in-valve TAVI, oral anticoagulation-containing regimens were associated with higher early mortality and higher 12-month MACCE rates than antiplatelet-only strategies. However, these associations should be interpreted cautiously, as they likely reflect in part the greater baseline comorbidity burden of patients prescribed anticoagulation rather than a direct treatment effect. No sustained haemodynamic benefit was observed at 12 months. Individualised antithrombotic therapy and prospective randomised studies are warranted.

Indexed as

AntithromboticOral anticoagulationViV TAVI

Identifiers

PMID42463578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.