ArticleCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026
Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Strategies Following Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using Real-World Registry Data.
Article in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incomplete Ascertainment of the Composite MACCE Outcome in the ACOR ViV-TAVI Antithrombotic Registry Analysis.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Antithrombotic therapy after valve-in-valve TAVI: discharge regimen as a marker of phenotype.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundValve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a less invasive alternative to redo surgery for failed surgical bioprostheses, but optimal antithrombotic management is uncertain.
objectivesTo compare outcomes across antithrombotic regimens after valve-in-valve procedures in real-world practice.
methodsIn the Australasian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (2018-2025), 1,050 adults were grouped by discharge regimen: single antiplatelet therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, oral anticoagulation, or oral anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy. Outcomes included 30-day and 12-month mortality, stroke/TIA, life-threatening or major bleeding, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and echocardiographic valve performance.
resultsThirty-day mortality was higher with oral anticoagulation (1.7%) and combination therapy (3.6%) than with single or dual antiplatelet therapy (both 0%; p < 0.001). The 30-day MACCE rate was greater with oral anticoagulation (4.5%) and combination therapy (4.4%) than with single (1.5%) or dual antiplatelet therapy (0.4%) (p = 0.003); stroke/TIA and bleeding were infrequent and similar across groups. At 12 months, MACCE remained highest with oral anticoagulation (11.8%) and combination therapy (10.7%) compared with single (5.0%) and dual antiplatelet therapy (3.2%) (p = 0.001). Mortality at 12 months was numerically higher with oral anticoagulation or combination therapy (5.2% and 4.4%) than with single or dual antiplatelet therapy (1.8% and 2.4%) (p = 0.116). At 30 days, transvalvular gradients were lower in patients receiving oral anticoagulation-containing regimens; however, no significant differences in gradients, valve area, ejection fraction, or regurgitation were observed at 12 months. In multivariable analysis, combination therapy was independently associated with higher odds of 12-month MACCE compared with SAPT (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.03-7.37; p = 0.043). Higher STS score and greater frailty were also independently associated with 12-month MACCE.
conclusionsIn this observational cohort of patients undergoing valve-in-valve TAVI, oral anticoagulation-containing regimens were associated with higher early mortality and higher 12-month MACCE rates than antiplatelet-only strategies. However, these associations should be interpreted cautiously, as they likely reflect in part the greater baseline comorbidity burden of patients prescribed anticoagulation rather than a direct treatment effect. No sustained haemodynamic benefit was observed at 12 months. Individualised antithrombotic therapy and prospective randomised studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42463578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.