ReviewInternational journal of hematology2026
Gene editing of hematopoietic stem cells: applications and advances.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the standard treatment for various hematologic genetic disorders resulting from single or multiple genes. However, this strategy is hindered by two main problems: failure to find a matching donor and the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after transplantation. Recent advances in gene editing, particularly nucleases exemplified by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) and related derivative tools, have overcome the limitations posed by the poor specificity of traditional gene modification techniques. A robust groundwork has been established for developing efficient, precise, and diverse gene editing strategies, facilitating the clinical application of ex vivo modified autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). In contrast, autologous HSC transplantation does not have the previously mentioned problems associated with allogeneic transplantation. Consequently, gene editing involving ex vivo genetic modification of HSCs and subsequent reinfusion in a single patient has emerged, with related research progressing from investigation into fundamental mechanisms and proof-of-concept studies to clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42463576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.