Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42463533›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Hair Removal with 755 nm Alexandrite Laser via Subcutaneous Route in Stage-III Ear Reconstruction by Expansion.

Tiange Wang, Xiaochen Sun, Haiyue Jiang, Lvping Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiange Wang *Department of Auricular Reconstruction, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 33 Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100144, People's Republic of China.
Xiaochen Sun *Department of Auricular Reconstruction, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 33 Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100144, People's Republic of China.
Haiyue JiangDepartment of Auricular Reconstruction, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 33 Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100144, People's Republic of China. jianghy_plastic@163.com.
Lvping HuangLaser Aesthetic Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 33 Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100144, People's Republic of China. huanglp_plastic@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital microtia reconstruction often introduces unwanted hair onto the new auricle. Laser hair removal can address this issue, but conventional external treatments require multiple sessions, increasing the overall treatment time, discomfort, and cost. Preclinical studies suggest that delivering laser energy from the flap's underside may improve efficiency by directly targeting hair follicles. We evaluated an intraoperative subcutaneous laser depilation approach applied during stage-III surgery to improve hair removal in this setting.

methodsA prospective cohort study included 44 microtia patients undergoing stage-III auricular reconstruction. 23 patients received an intraoperative 755 nm Alexandrite laser via subcutaneous route during surgery, while 21 patients had a standard external laser session one week before surgery. Laser settings were adjusted for each: subcutaneous treatments used 10-12 J/cm

resultsBoth methods produced significant hair reduction at 2 months. The subcutaneous group achieved 48.3% mean hair count reduction versus 44.7% in the epidermal group (P < 0.001). The subcutaneous approach required lower laser fluence (11.04 vs 16.29 J/cm

conclusionIntraoperative subcutaneous 755 nm Alexandrite laser depilation integrated into stage-III ear reconstruction appeared to be a safe and effective approach for reducing hair on the reconstructed auricle. Compared with conventional preoperative external laser treatment, this method showed a trend toward greater hair reduction while using lower fluence. This technique may reduce the need for multiple separate laser sessions and improve patient convenience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Congenital MicrotiaHair RemovalLasers, Solid-StatePlastic Surgery ProceduresTissue ExpansionAdolescentAdultChildCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentAuricular reconstructionDepilationHair removalIPLLaser

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.