ArticleScientific reports2026
YOLO11-guided swin transformer for molar occlusion classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molar occlusion identification is a fundamental component of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Conventional assessment using intraoral photographs relies on manual visual inspection, making it time-consuming and susceptible to inter-observer variability. Moreover, existing deep learning (DL)-based approaches either analyze the entire image without explicit anatomical localization or depend on manually defined regions of interest, thereby limiting clinical applicability. Accordingly, this study proposes a DL framework for molar occlusion classification. The proposed framework blends YOLO11-based anatomical localization with a Swin Transformer (Swin-T) for occlusion recognition. YOLO11 performs automatic instance segmentation to identify the molar region and eliminate non-diagnostic background content. The resulting prediction-guided molar crops are then processed by Swin-T, which learns discriminative representations of posterior occlusal relationships through hierarchical shifted-window attention and multiscale feature modeling. A dataset of 1101 intraoral images spanning five occlusion classes was used. The localization stage achieved a Dice coefficient of 96.82%. The developed framework attained classification accuracy of 98.17%, outperforming expert orthodontist assessment. Furthermore, the proposed framework outperformed well-established models, including ResNet50V2, DenseNet201, MobileNetV3-Large, EfficientNetV2-S, and vision transformer (ViT-B/16). Experimental results demonstrated perfect recall for Half Class II, Class III, and Half Class III, while maintaining strong predictive performance for Class I and Class II. Localization and explainability analyses confirmed that the framework consistently attended to clinically relevant posterior occlusal structures, affirming the anatomical plausibility of its predictions. These findings provide a promising foundation for automated molar occlusion assessment and suggest potential for future integration of DL-driven decision support into digital orthodontic workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.