ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
A large-scale Bayesian validation of FIDBV2 and FIDBV3 methods for adult age-at-death estimation using root dentin translucency in single-rooted teeth.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Statistical calibration of the results in adult age-at-death estimation is a fundamental yet challenging task in forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology. This study conducts a large-scale Bayesian validation of two probabilistic models for adult dental age-at-death estimation: the established FIDBv2, using root dentin translucency and periodontal retraction, and a novel simplified counterpart, FIDBv3, relying solely on translucency. Analysis of 8,595 single-rooted teeth from a global sample of 3,801 individuals demonstrates that FIDBv3 consistently outperforms its predecessor, reducing overall mean inaccuracy by 22.52% and increasing total sample accuracy by 8.11 percentage points. This superior performance across diverse populations indicates that periodontal retraction introduces more statistical noise than a reliable biological signal. The strategic exclusion of this variable, combined with the inclusion of a logarithmic transformation that better models the non-linear trajectory of translucency development, yields a more biologically realistic and universally applicable method. This simplification also streamlines analysis, while deployment as a free, open-access web platform democratizes global access to this robust, probability-based estimation. Despite persistent challenges at the extremes of the lifespan, FIDBv3 establishes a new standard for transparent, reliable and practical dental age-at-death estimation in forensic and archaeological contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42463518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.