ArticleOccupational therapy international2026
Scoping Review of Occupational Therapy for Distal Radius Fractures, Including Complications.
Article in Occupational therapy international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scoping Review of Occupational Therapy for Distal Radius Fractures, Including Complications.Occupational therapy international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review is aimed at identifying and mapping occupational therapy-related assessments and interventions reported in prospective interventional studies and case reports on distal radius fractures, including studies addressing complications. Additionally, the review sought to summarize the current evidence in this field and identify areas requiring further research. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies primarily emphasized impairment-level outcomes, such as range of motion and grip strength, whereas activity, participation, occupational performance, and psychosocial aspects were addressed less frequently. Only a limited number of studies reported complications, and the included studies generally employed relatively narrow eligibility criteria. These findings suggest that existing evidence may have limited applicability to the broader population of patients with distal radius fractures, particularly those with complications. Future research should include broader patient populations and incorporate occupation-focused approaches to better address activity, participation, and occupational performance in distal radius fracture rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.