ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2026
An Examination of the Relationship Between Primal World Beliefs and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Three Samples of U.S. Adults.
Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPrimal world beliefs (primals) are fundamental assumptions about the world that may serve as suicide risk factors. This study examined relationships between primals and suicidal thoughts and behaviors in three samples of adults with recent suicidal ideation (SI).
methodStudy 1 analyzed cross-sectional data (N = 304 undergraduates; N = 390 Prolific participants) involving measures of primals, SI, wish to live (WTL), wish to die (WTD), and coping self-efficacy. Study 2 included Prolific participants (N = 174) who completed measures of primals and SI at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Cross-lagged panel analyses examined temporal relationships between primals and SI.
resultsPositive primals were associated with lower SI, greater WTL, lower WTD, and higher suicidal coping self-efficacy. Believing the world is meaningful, needs me, and good at baseline predicted lower SI at 1-month follow up, whereas SI at baseline did not predict primals at follow up. Primals were inconsistently related to past suicide attempts.
conclusionFindings support a relationship between primals and SI both cross-sectionally and over time. Positive primals may play a protective role against SI over time and may serve as a promising treatment target for adapting existing interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.