ArticleGenome research2026
Genome-wide crossover analysis in the holocentric pantry moth reveals strong crossover assurance and interference during spermatogenesis.
Article in Genome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meiosis relies on programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to initiate recombination between homologous chromosomes. Only a fraction of these breaks mature into crossovers (COs), creating the chiasmata essential for physically linking homologs and ensuring their accurate segregation in meiosis I. Errors in CO number or placement underlie a large fraction of human infertility and aneuploidies, yet how DSBs are designated to become COs and how the mechanisms ensuring COs form on all chromosomes (CO assurance) are not well understood, particularly in systems with a large number of chromosomes. Here, we investigate CO formation in the pantry moth,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.