ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2026
Changes in the indications for and outcomes of gastrostomy tube placement: an analysis of serial, prospective multi-site audits in Northern England.
Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGastrostomy tubes placed either endoscopically (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)) or radiologically (radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG)) are established as standard methods for medium to long-term enteral feeding. There is a paucity of large-scale audit data to identify the main indications, complication rates and outcomes of patients having a PEG or RIG in the UK. The aim of our study was to determine changes in the use of and outcomes from gastrostomy tube placement in a large cohort of patients across the North East of England and North Cumbria.
methodsThe Northern Nutrition Network is a multidisciplinary network involving all hospitals in the North East of England and North Cumbria-an area with a population of 3.2 million in 2024. We conducted six 3-month cross-sectional prospective audits covering all hospitals where gastrostomies are placed between 2004 and 2022.
resultsA total of 889 procedures were performed during the six audit periods. Mean age has decreased from 71 years in 2004 to 63 years in 2022. Estimated incidence of gastrostomy placement in 2022 was 19.2 per 100 000. The most common indication in the first three audits was stroke; however, subsequently, this was replaced by dysphagia due to an ear-nose-throat/upper gastrointestinal malignancy. The use of prophylactic antibiotics increased from 83% to 93% during the 18-year period. 7-day mortality reduced from 2% in 2004 to 1% in 2022. Reduction was demonstrated in 30-day mortality rate from 9% in 2004 to 2.5% in 2022.
conclusionChanges in gastrostomy placement practice have occurred over time, with a change in the most common indication, a trend to use in younger patients, greater use of prophylactic antibiotics and a reduction in 7-day and 30-day mortality. Dementia no longer appears as an indication for the placement of a gastrostomy, in keeping with international guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.