ReviewRMD open2026
Beyond Resnick and Niwayama: a structured narrative literature review on the clinical and imaging phenotypes of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH).
Review in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 1975, the Resnick and Niwayama classification criteria have served as the standard framework for defining diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in research. These criteria predominantly identify advanced disease. Accumulating evidence towards an updated definition of DISH is warranted. In this review we aimed to re-evaluate the definition of DISH in light of contemporary evidence and identify elements that may inform future classification criteria.A literature review was conducted of studies published between 1975 and 2025. Data extraction targeted imaging features, including site-specific bone formation and pre-DISH characteristics, as well as clinical features, functional outcomes and available markers. Findings were qualitatively synthesised.119 studies were included. Imaging data indicated that degenerative spinal disease alone is insufficient to exclude DISH. Bony bridges most commonly affect the thoracic spine, though involvement of the cervical and lumbar regions is well documented. Disease progression is typically slow, and frequent entheseal involvement of pelvic, chest wall and peripheral sites. Epidemiological data demonstrate a rising prevalence with age and a male predominance. DISH shows strong association with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, elevated body mass index, raised systolic blood pressure, dyslipidaemia, hyperuricaemia and cardiovascular disease. Inflammatory markers are generally within normal ranges. Evidence regarding physical impairment remains mixed, with some studies reporting reduction in spinal mobility and chest expansion alongside broader functional limitations.This review moves beyond the Resnick and Niwayama criteria to offer an updated framework to support the development of future DISH classification criteria, particularly to earlier disease stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.