Observational studyBMJ open respiratory research2026
Longitudinal analysis of inspiratory support requirements in obesity hypoventilation syndrome: is NIV de-escalation warranted?
Observational study in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptimal long-term management and inspiratory support requirements remain debated in obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS).
objectivesThis prospective, observational study assessed inspiratory support requirements in OHS patients initiating noninvasive ventilation (NIV) after acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, using a volume-assured mode targeting normocapnia.
methodsVentilator data and clinical parameters were collected at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after initiation of NIV. Inspiratory support requirements were assessed using driving pressure and apparent respiratory system compliance and compared over time using the Wilcoxon test and Friedman analysis of variance. Groups with persistent and minimal inspiratory support needs at 1 year were compared using Mann-Whitney, χ
resultsOf 40 enrolled patients, 39 completed the study. Therapeutic adherence (37 (94.9%)) and efficacy (35 (89.7%)) were high. Inspiratory support requirements decreased over the study period (12.1 (9.6-14.9) to 9.9 (6.3-12.2) cmH₂O, p<0.001), though 84.6% of patients still required >5 cmH₂O driving pressure. Initial driving pressure, higher minute ventilation and higher apparent respiratory system compliance were associated with reduced support requirements after 1 year, but no baseline parameter reliably predicted minimal support need. Reduced ventilatory support at 6 months demonstrated the strongest correlation with maintaining lower driving pressure at 12 months.
conclusionsInspiratory support needs reduce over 12 months in OHS patients acutely initiated on long-term NIV, but few patients showed only minimal inspiratory support requirements to maintain normocapnia. Reliable reduction was apparent after 6 months of treatment, suggesting that respiratory muscle recovery is slower than previously assumed. Further studies are needed to verify whether an initial 'hit hard' approach with sequential de-escalation of ventilatory support results in optimal outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.