Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42463195›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

What are barriers and facilitators for implementation of music interventions for minor surgical procedures in general practice in the Netherlands? A qualitative study.

Milan van Engelen, Jorrit G Verhoeven, Erwin Ista, Dieuwke Schiphof, Johannes Jeekel, Markus Klimek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milan van Engelen *Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jorrit G Verhoeven *Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands j.g.verhoeven@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6872-7079
Erwin IstaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nursing Science, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1257-3108
Dieuwke SchiphofDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1293-6346
Johannes JeekelDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Markus KlimekDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-9929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators affecting implementation of perioperative music interventions in general practice.

designA qualitative implementation study using semistructured interviews. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide data collection and analysis. The domains used were: innovation, outer setting, inner setting and individuals. Primary outcomes were barriers and facilitators for the implementation of perioperative music interventions in general practice.

settingGeneral practices in the Netherlands.

participantsDutch general practitioners.

results15 participants were included, among which 11 general practice owners, one salaried general practitioner, two locum general practitioners and one general practitioner in training. In total, 19 key barriers and 34 key facilitators were identified. For the innovation domain, a lack of research conducted in primary care and low awareness of the intervention were considered barriers whereas user-friendliness and low costs were seen as facilitators. For the outer setting domain, no barriers were identified and possibilities for external financing, inclusion in clinical guidelines and patient and media pressure were considered facilitators. For the inner setting, the lack of readily accessible information aimed at primary care was seen as a barrier, whereas a shared belief in minimising perioperative pain and anxiety was seen as a facilitator. For the individuals domain, a pre-existing heavy workload and understaffing were seen as barriers, whereas the autonomous role of general practitioners was seen as a facilitator.

conclusionsSeveral key barriers and facilitators for implementation of perioperative music interventions in general practice were identified. A lack of research performed in the setting of primary care of the efficacy of the music intervention and low awareness among general practitioners were examples of barriers. Notable facilitators were user-friendliness, low-costs and the autonomous position of the general practitioner. Implementation of music intervention by general practitioners seems feasible, yet there is still room for more research to be performed in the specific context of primary care.

Indexed as

General PracticeMusic TherapyPerioperative CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNetherlandsQualitative ResearchCOMPLEMENTARY MEDICINEGeneral PracticeImplementation Science

Identifiers

PMID42463195
PMCPMC13374461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.