ArticleBMJ open2026
Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in patients with acute mountain sickness: a study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute mountain sickness (AMS) commonly occurs during rapid ascent to high altitudes and significantly affects the health and cognitive function of travellers and specialised personnel in high-altitude environments. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive, safe and portable neuromodulation technique with potential benefits for AMS. This protocol evaluates taVNS efficacy for AMS and associated cognitive impairment and explores its mechanisms via multiomics analyses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled study involving ≥158 participants with AMS, who will be randomly assigned to receive either active or sham taVNS for five consecutive days. The primary outcome is the change in the 2018 Lake Louise AMS Score at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes are the Visual Analogue Scale for headache, Stanford Sleepiness Scale, Groningen Sleep Quality Questionnaire, resting heart rate, resting blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, cerebral oxygen saturation, Corsi task score and the Picture Recall Subscale of the Wechsler Adult Memory Scale, which collectively assess symptom relief, physiological responses and cognitive function. The exploratory outcomes include faecal and urinary metabolomics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All investigations performed in this study were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (reference number: P24013-PJ13). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and feedback for the study participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/; number: TMCTR2024000642.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.