ArticleBMJ open2026
Occupational therapists' use of digital technologies to support people with disabilities in engaging in occupation: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDigital tools such as virtual reality, mobile applications and digital devices are being implemented across various healthcare practice settings. Engagement in occupations is central to occupational therapy, supporting health and quality of life. Occupational therapists support people with disabilities to participate in occupations by enhancing their abilities or adapting tasks and environments. However, literature rarely specifies how digital technologies are used by occupational therapists, with whom they are implemented, when and where they are delivered, what occupations are addressed or the enablers and barriers that influence the uptake of digital technologies in practice. This scoping review will map and synthesise the existing evidence on how occupational therapists use digital technologies to support people with disabilities to engage in occupations. By identifying the types of technologies used, their purposes, target populations and practice contexts, this review will inform the effective use of digital technologies by occupational therapists and their clients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping reviews and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. To identify relevant evidence, we will search several electronic databases, including CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, ERIC and OTseeker. Search limits will include full-text articles published in English from 2020 onwards. Title and abstract screening will be conducted independently by at least two reviewers against the inclusion and exclusion criteria followed by full-text review. Data extraction will use a structured form to capture key information such as study characteristics, types of digital technologies, country, participant information, occupation-based focus of intervention and reported outcomes. The extracted data will be analysed using both qualitative and quantitative approaches, with findings presented in tables, narrative summaries and other descriptive formats. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review as it will synthesise evidence from existing literature. The review findings will be reported in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://osf.io/3dy9z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.