ReviewTranslational oncology2026
Pathway-driven therapeutic stratification in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Review in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains clinically managed largely through anatomical stage and performance status, despite major inter-patient heterogeneity and dynamic pathway adaptation during progression. In this review, we propose a hypothesis-generating, stage-aware framework in which clinical stage and established molecular subtypes are considered complementary rather than competing stratification axes. Stage-resolved transcriptomic modeling identified a directional separation across up-front resectable, borderline/locally advanced, primary metastatic and liver metastatic samples, with PC1 explaining 51.1% of the variance and separating early from metastatic states, whereas PC2 explained 30.2% and captured immune/stromal remodeling. We interpret these observations cautiously as pathway-level signals that require functional and clinical validation, not as an established biological paradigm. The model suggests a transition from MAPK-enriched, proliferative and partially immune-competent tumors toward metastatic ecosystems characterized by PI3K-AKT-mTOR engagement, MYC amplification, mitochondrial metabolism, proteostasis support and immune exclusion. We further distinguish approved standards, negative clinical experiences, early clinical signals and preclinical hypotheses. The central conclusion is that PDAC therapeutic stratification should integrate stage, molecular subtype, treatment line, tissue context and evidence level before pathway-directed interventions are clinically prioritized. Accordingly, this review should be read as a translational prioritization framework rather than as a treatment algorithm: it organizes where pathway-directed hypotheses are most biologically plausible, where they are clinically supported, and where they remain insufficiently validated for routine decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.