ArticleEBioMedicine2026
Identifying sex-specific sub-phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease progression using longitudinal electronic health records.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding subphenotypes in electronic medical records within late-onset Alzheimer's disease reveals heterogeneity and sex-specific differences.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's Disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder, with women comprising nearly two-thirds of individuals with AD. However, sex-specific heterogeneity in AD progression remains insufficiently understood. A data-driven approach is needed to characterise such heterogeneity from longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs).
methodsWe developed a deep learning-based framework to uncover sex-specific AD sub-phenotypes using longitudinal EHRs from OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. We constructed temporal representations of these EHRs and employed an autoencoder architecture to generate latent embeddings, followed by clustering to derive sex-specific sub-phenotypes with associated progression patterns. We also performed statistical and survival analyses to unravel the characteristics of our identified sub-phenotypes.
findingsFrom 1665 individuals with AD (961 females, 704 males), we identified five major sex-specific sub-phenotypes of AD with distinct progression pathways and comorbidity patterns. Female-dominant sub-phenotypes presented later AD onset, longer disease duration, and enrichment of respiratory and neurological disorders. Male-dominant sub-phenotypes exhibited earlier onset, shorter duration, and higher prevalence of endocrine and metabolic conditions. Survival analysis showed significant differences in time to AD onset across sub-phenotypes.
interpretationOur findings revealed distinct disease trajectories and comorbidity patterns between male- and female-dominant subgroups with AD. This study provides insight into sex-specific AD progression and demonstrates a data-driven framework for characterising disease heterogeneity using longitudinal EHRs.
fundingThis study was supported by grants from the Florida Department of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the NIHNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.