Observational studyJMIR medical informatics2026
Machine Learning-Augmented Traditional Analysis of Lactate vs Lactate-to-Albumin Ratio for Predicting Mortality Risk in Patients With Sepsis: Large-Scale Retrospective Study.
Observational study in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective risk stratification in sepsis remains a critical clinical challenge. Serum lactate is a cornerstone biomarker of metabolic dysfunction, yet its predictive limitations-particularly in patients without severe hyperlactatemia-are well recognized. The lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR), a composite mixed-unit index integrating markers of acute metabolic dysfunction and systemic inflammation, has emerged as a promising predictor; however, its incremental discriminative advantage over lactate had not been formally tested in a large multicenter cohort using paired statistical methodology.
objectiveThis study aims to determine whether LAR provides statistically significantly higher prediction of 28-day mortality than lactate alone in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis, using threshold effect analysis, restricted cubic splines, DeLong test, and 9 interpretable machine learning models.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 3637 adult patients with sepsis from the multicenter eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD; 208 hospitals, United States, 2014-2015). The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality among patients surviving the initial 48-hour ICU admission period. We used multivariable logistic regression (LR), Cox proportional-hazards regression, threshold effect analysis, restricted cubic spline modeling, DeLong test for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) comparison, and machine learning models evaluated with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) for interpretability. The cohort was divided 70/30 (stratified) into training and held-out test sets; the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique was applied exclusively within the training partition to prevent data leakage.
resultsLAR consistently demonstrated stronger and more stable associations with mortality than lactate across all subgroups. DeLong test confirmed statistically significantly higher AUC for LAR: 28-day hospital mortality (AUC
conclusionsLAR demonstrates statistically significantly higher discrimination than lactate alone for 28-day sepsis mortality prediction. LAR may offer greater prognostic utility in patients without severe hyperlactatemia, a population in whom early risk stratification may be particularly relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.