Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42462149›Full record

Trial reportJMIR research protocols2026

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Laceback Ligature in Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Loon Han Tan, Siti Hajjar Nasir, Joo Ming Cheong, Kumeran Mohan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Loon Han TanDepartment of Orthodontics, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, Bandar Indera Mahkota, Kuantan, Pahang, 25200, Malaysia, 60197297546.ORCID 0009-0000-0475-9231
Siti Hajjar NasirDepartment of Orthodontics, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, Bandar Indera Mahkota, Kuantan, Pahang, 25200, Malaysia, 60197297546.ORCID 0000-0002-8792-6724
Joo Ming CheongDepartment of Orthodontics, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, Bandar Indera Mahkota, Kuantan, Pahang, 25200, Malaysia, 60197297546.ORCID 0000-0002-7487-7396
Kumeran MohanDepartment of Orthodontics, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, Bandar Indera Mahkota, Kuantan, Pahang, 25200, Malaysia, 60197297546.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-9966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laceback ligatures are passive stainless-steel auxiliaries tied from the first permanent molar hook to the canine bracket during the alignment phase of orthodontic fixed appliance treatment, predominantly in premolar extraction cases. Despite equivocal evidence on their effectiveness in controlling anterior tooth position, lacebacks are routinely used to stabilize flexible nickel-titanium archwires against masticatory forces. Their effects on 3 clinically important outcomes, oral hygiene, appliance complication rates, and patient-reported pain, have never been investigated in a randomized trial, representing gaps explicitly identified in a prior systematic review. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of passive laceback ligatures during the alignment phase of orthodontic fixed appliance treatment, specifically oral hygiene status, archwire and laceback complication rates, and pain. Methods: This is a single-center, single-blind, split-mouth randomized controlled trial conducted at the Orthodontic Clinic, International Islamic University Malaysia. Eligible participants are patients aged 15 years and older, medically fit with Basic Periodontal Examination scores of 0-2, requiring full fixed appliance treatment with bilateral premolar extractions and no prior orthodontic treatment. Those with craniofacial deformities, systemic illness, or disability affecting oral hygiene compliance are excluded. Each participant's oral cavity is randomly allocated using a minimization method, so that one side receives a passive 0.010-inch stainless-steel laceback from the first molar hook to the canine bracket, while the contralateral side receives identical standard fixed appliance treatment (McLaughlin, Bennett, and Trevisi prescription brackets, 0.014-inch superelastic nickel-titanium archwires, and elastomeric modules) without laceback. Outcomes are assessed at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), and 8 weeks (T2) after laceback placement. The primary outcome is the orthodontic plaque index. Secondary outcomes include archwire and laceback complication frequencies and pain assessed by visual analog scale area under the curve. A total of 38 participants provided 85% power to detect a 1-unit orthodontic plaque index difference (α=.05). Mixed-model repeated-measures analysis is applied to plaque scores; paired parametric or nonparametric tests to other outcomes. Plaque and archwire assessors are blinded to treatment allocation. Results: Ethical approval and funding were secured in January 2026. Participant recruitment commenced in February 2026 with a target completion of June 2027. Pretrial examiner calibration achieved satisfactory agreement (interrater Cohen kappa=0.801-0.804; intrarater reliability=0.806-0.862). As of paper submission, 24 participants have been enrolled, and 14 have completed all data collection visits, with no protocol deviations recorded. Primary analysis is scheduled for October 2027; the results are targeted for submission by June 2028. Conclusions: This protocol describes the first randomized controlled trial to simultaneously evaluate oral hygiene, appliance complication rates, and patient-reported pain associated with laceback use during orthodontic alignment. The split-mouth design controls for interparticipant confounders, and the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes will ensure that findings directly support evidence-based, patient-centered orthodontic practice.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliances, FixedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleOrthodontic BracketsOrthodontic WiresSingle-Blind Methodlacebackorthodontic tooth movementorthodontic wirespatient reported outcome measuressplit-mouth studytreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID42462149
PMCPMC13375081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.