ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026
Moral Distress and the Governance of Attention in Nursing: A Hanian Reading of the Structural Restriction of Moral Agency.
Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contemporary nursing is increasingly shaped by performance pressures, demands for traceability, and technological mediation. These developments do more than add tasks to everyday clinical work. They also shape what nurses can attend to, how they judge situations, and whether they are able to sustain the care they believe a patient needs. This article examines moral distress as a structural restriction of moral agency: nurses may recognise what a situation requires yet find themselves unable to act accordingly. Drawing on Byung-Chul Han's analyses of performance, psychopolitics, infocracy, and the palliative society, we develop a tetradic matrix that relates these contemporary logics to four goods of nursing care: attention, clinical judgement, alterity, and hope. In practice, these goods refer to sustained presence, prudent deliberation, recognition of the patient as a singular person, and hope understood as non-abandonment. Applied to the nursing metaparadigm, the matrix shows how clinical time, attention, documentation, and technological mediation can become places where moral agency is either supported or weakened. The article therefore argues for a shift in the ethical evaluation of nursing work: from a narrow focus on individual resilience towards the governance of attention and the institutional conditions that make responsible care possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.