ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026
Camp, Nursing, and the Politics of Seriousness.
Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Camp Aesthetics as an Ethics of Transnormative Care: Challenging the Seriousness of Nursing From the Perspective of Latin American Travesti-Trans Theory.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026Article
- Nursing WerkNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines how camp, an aesthetic grounded in exaggeration, humor, and theatricality, functions as a legitimate nursing practice that challenges the cisheteronormative seriousness embedded in professional nursing culture. I begin by tracing how seriousness became a dominant aesthetic standard in nursing, shaping expectations for comportment, emotional restraint, and professionalism in ways that marginalize queer and trans nurses. Drawing from Sontag's Notes on Camp, I argue that seriousness is not an objective requirement of safe or ethical care but a culturally specific performance that restricts who and what count as 'professional'. I then introduce camp as a counter-aesthetic that exposes the performative nature of these norms. Through playfulness and intentional artifice, camp destabilizes the boundaries of professional conduct and opens space for alternative, culturally grounded expressions of care. To illustrate this, I examine the work of Bobbi Campbell, known as Sister Florence Nightmare RN, as a historical exemplar of a drag nurse who promoted health education, reduced stigma, and community resilience during the early HIV/AIDS epidemic. I then pull on Nurse Anne Thracks and Mandy Mango as contemporary examples of drag-as-nursing. These examples demonstrate how queer nurses use drag and camp to strategically engage communities, communicate health information, and model radically inclusive care. I extend this analysis to contemporary nursing contexts, arguing that integrating camp is a form of ethical authenticity aligned with the profession's commitments to dignity, self-regard, and social justice. I show how campy and drag nurses actively subvert restrictive norms by transforming the figure of the nurse-through language, attire, and performance-while still providing effective, culturally relevant care. Ultimately, I propose camp as a generative framework for reimagining nursing aesthetics and practice. Embracing camp expands the boundaries of what is considered professional, ethical, and therapeutic, offering a model of nursing that honors joy, relationality, sociopolitical wellness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.