Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42462117›Full record

ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026

Nursing Moral Agency in Technology-Mediated Care: Reclaiming Professional Responsibility in the Fifth Industrial Revolution.

Joseph Andrew Pepito, Ray Anne Labra-Pepito, Jason Arnold Pepito, Faustino Jerome Babate, Gil Platon Soriano, Judith Ismael, Sitti Shierwina Al-Jumayile

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph Andrew PepitoCebu Doctors University, Cebu, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-1572
Ray Anne Labra-PepitoHorizon Health Network, New Brunswick, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7711-3395
Jason Arnold PepitoParkside Care Limited, Newcastle, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1996-8837
Faustino Jerome BabateFilipino Nursing Diaspora Network, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8261-2961
Gil Platon SorianoNational University, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6349-5560
Judith IsmaelCebu Institute of Technology University, Cebu, Philippines.
Sitti Shierwina Al-JumayileCebu Institute of Technology University, Cebu, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8151-4817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nursing practice is increasingly enacted within environments structured by intelligent technologies that filter perception, generate classifications and shape clinical priorities. While nurse scholars have begun to examine moral agency in the context of artificial intelligence, much of the broader ethical discourse on AI in healthcare continues to foreground governance, safety and institutional accountability, leaving the conditions under which nurses exercise professional moral responsibility comparatively under-theorized. This paper argues that technology-mediated care constitutes a moral environment that reshapes how responsibility is distributed, interpreted and enacted in clinical practice. Drawing on nursing ethics and socio-technical thought, it distinguishes between technical delegation and moral delegation, clarifying that while intelligent systems may inform action, they cannot assume moral answerability. Nursing moral agency is reconceptualized as relationally oriented moral perception, interpretive judgement and accountable action that remains fundamentally non-delegable, even under conditions of extensive mediation. Boundary-setting is advanced as a disciplined ethical practice through which nurses delineate the limits of technological authority and sustain professional responsibility. By articulating moral agency as both situated and irreducible, this analysis contributes a conceptual framework for understanding ethical responsibility in the Fifth Industrial Revolution and re-centres the nurse as the accountable moral subject within technology-mediated care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEthics, NursingMoralsHumansartificial intelligenceboundary‐settingfifth industrial revolutionmoral agencynursing ethicsrelational ethicstechnology‐mediated care

Identifiers

PMID42462117
PMCPMC13375117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.