Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42462087›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2026

Alteration of Acid-Binding Capacity of Various Nursery Pig Diets and Its Influence on Properties of Digesta Along the Gastrointestinal Tract.

Hyunjun Choi, Sung Woo Kim

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyunjun ChoiDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United State of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5874-2328
Sung Woo KimDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United State of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-1943

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 02893North Carolina Agricultural Foundation 660101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of reduced dietary acid-binding capacity (ABC) by acidifiers on the properties of digesta along the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. In Exp. 1, 144 pigs at 21 d of age [6.5 ± 0.9 kg body weight (BW)] were housed in pens (3 pigs/pen). In Exp. 2, 540 pigs weaned at 21 d of age (6.9 ± 0.9 kg BW) were housed in pens (3 barrows and 3 gilts/pen). In Exp. 1, the basal diet was supplemented with 0.25% bacitracin methylene disalicylate, 0.30 or 0.50% lactic acid-formic acid blend, or 0.30% lactic acid-formic acid-benzoic acid blend. In Exp. 2, the basal diet was supplemented with 0.25% bacitracin methylene disalicylate, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50% benzoic acid, or 0.30, 0.40, or 0.60% sodium benzoate. In both Exp. 1 and 2, pigs were fed diets in 3 phases: phase 1 (7 d in both Exp. 1 and 2), phase 2 (14 d in Exp. 1 and 17 d in Exp. 2), and phase 3 (21 d in Exp. 1 and 17 d in Exp. 2), respectively. The range of ABC at pH 4 in diets was 256 to 300, 194 to 220, and 129 to 176 meq/kg in phases 1, 2, and 3 of Exp. 1, and 234 to 273, 214 to 247, and 152 to 197 meq/kg in phases 1, 2, and 3 of Exp. 2, respectively. On d 42 in Exp. 1 and d 41 in Exp. 2, one pig representing the median BW in each pen was euthanized, and digesta from the stomach, proximal jejunum, distal jejunum, and cecum were collected to analyze the properties of digesta. The pH of digesta in the stomach was 4.0, which was lower (p < 0.05) than the pH of digesta in the proximal jejunum (6.0), distal jejunum (5.9), and cecum (5.5). The pH of digesta in the cecum was lower (p < 0.05) than the pH of the digesta in the proximal and distal jejunum. The dry matter (DM) content in stomach digesta was 32.5%, which was higher (p < 0.05) than the DM content of digesta in the proximal jejunum (14.9%), distal jejunum (14.4%), and cecum (14.3%). The ABC at pH 4 of nursery diets was not correlated with the ABC at pH 3 of freeze-dried stomach digesta and pH of stomach digesta. However, the ABC-3 of freeze-dried stomach digesta was positively correlated (p < 0.05) with the DM content in stomach digesta (r = 0.57) and the pH of stomach digesta (r = 0.63) in nursery pigs. The DM content in stomach digesta was also positively correlated (p < 0.05) with the pH of stomach digesta of nursery pigs (r = 0.54). In conclusion, reducing dietary ABC by 40 to 50 meq/kg using acidifiers was not sufficient to reduce ABC or pH of stomach digesta in nursery pigs. However, the DM content in stomach digesta was positively correlated with its ABC and pH indicating that a decrease in the DM content and ABC of stomach digesta, if influenced by diets, is a primary factor contributing to reducing digesta pH in the stomach of nursery pigs.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietGastrointestinal ContentsGastrointestinal TractAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsFemaleHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleSwineacid‐binding capacitydry matter of digestanursery pigspH of digesta

Identifiers

PMID42462087
PMCPMC13576602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.