ArticlePloS one2026
Structure function relationships differ between optic neuritis and glaucoma with comparable optical coherence tomography findings.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study compared structure-function relationships between patients with optic neuritis (ON) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), focusing on the extent of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) damage and its correlation with visual field (VF) defects. We included 194 patients (ON: 47; POAG: 147) referred to Yonsei University Severance Eye Hospital between 2017 and 2023. RNFL and GCIPL thickness, VF indices, and the relationship between structural and functional measures were assessed. Despite comparable RNFL and GCIPL thinning, ON demonstrated significantly better VF performance than POAG (mean deviation: -2.26 dB vs. -7.32 dB; VF index: 95.48% vs. 80.43%; both p < 0.001). In POAG, VF loss was strongly correlated with structural parameters, whereas in ON, VF remained preserved even at low RNFL and GCIPL values. Linear regression with robust error estimation confirmed significant interaction between disease type and structure-function slopes (p < 0.01). These findings persisted after 1:2 propensity score matching for age and comorbidities (ON: n = 29; POAG: n = 58; all interaction p < 0.05), age-adjusted multivariable regression, and a sensitivity analysis restricted to non-diabetic participants (ON: n = 45; POAG: n = 124; all interaction p < 0.001). This dissociation was evident at RNFL <90 µm and GCIPL <80 µm, where ON showed better VF indices than POAG with similar structural loss. The differences in structure-function relationships underscore the importance of disease-specific diagnostic approaches and unraveling the distinct mechanisms underlying ON and POAG to improve the management of visual impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.