Trial reportPloS one2026
Respiratory pattern change in female and male runners by respiratory tract restriction using a respirator.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07032740 (Respiratory Pattern Change in Runners by Respiratory Tract Restriction Using a Respirator), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Respiratory Pattern Change in Runners by Respiratory Tract Restriction Using a Respirator
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory protective equipment, particularly filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), are increasingly used during physical activity, yet their influence on breathing mechanics remains unclear. This randomized, crossover trial investigated the impact of N95 FFRs on thoracoabdominal breathing patterns during graded treadmill exercise. Twenty competitive runners (10 male, 10 female; 18.9 ± 2.3 years) performed Bruce protocol tests with and without FFRs, while optoelectronic plethysmography quantified the contributions of pulmonary ribcage (RCp), abdominal ribcage (RCa), and abdomen (Ab) to tidal volume. Global ventilatory parameters (tidal volume, breathing frequency, minute ventilation) were unaffected by FFR use. However, compartmental analysis revealed significant alterations in breathing patterns at higher intensities. At 12 and 15 minutes, FFRs reduced RCp contribution (-7.85 ± 2.49%, P = 0.002; -8.41 ± 3.35%, P = 0.012) and increased Ab contribution (+5.97 ± 2.08%, P = 0.004; + 6.51 ± 2.80%, P = 0.020). Across all phases, females demonstrated moderate, but variable RCp dominance (P = 0.052). These findings indicate that while FFRs do not impair overall ventilation in trained runners, they substantially modify the biomechanics of breathing under load, reflecting compensatory adjustments that likely help preserve ventilatory efficiency. The results suggest that well-trained athletes may tolerate acute respiratory stress more effectively than the general population, which has implications for athletic training, rehabilitation, and occupational health where respirator use is required.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT07032740.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.