Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42461921›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Routine milk records reveal novel two-way interactions shaping ketosis risk in German dairy cows.

Franziska Gheronte, Martina Hoedemaker, Kerstin-Elisabeth Müller, Gabriela Knubben-Schweizer, Roswitha Merle, Dörte Döpfer, Nora Mansfeld, Yury Zablotski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Franziska GheronteClinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Oberschleissheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5025-3326
Martina HoedemakerClinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Kerstin-Elisabeth MüllerClinic for Ruminants and Swine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gabriela Knubben-SchweizerClinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Roswitha MerleInstitute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8688-2926
Dörte DöpferFood Animal Production Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Nora MansfeldClinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Yury ZablotskiClinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Oberschleissheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6928-4089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ketosis is one of the most prevalent metabolic disorders in dairy herds, with significant economic and welfare implications. However, existing literature often examines risk predictors in isolation, and their interactions and dependencies remain poorly understood. This study investigated how production, health, and management factors - and their interactions - are associated with ketosis risk (KR) at the animal level in German dairy cows, with a focus on German Holstein (GH) and German Simmental (SIM) breeds. Data from 76,809 cows across 717 German dairy farms collected between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed using multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects logistic regression with two-way interactions and random forest algorithms. KR was predicted using a non-invasive, widely applicable approach based on milk composition thresholds derived from monthly test-day records. Key risk factors included breed, parity, energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield, body condition, lameness, housing, and lactation stage. Twelve significant two-way interactions were identified, highlighting the multifactorial and interdependent nature of KR, most frequently involving lactation stage (six interactions), followed by ECM yield (five interactions) and breed (four interactions). The overall predicted probability of KR was 7.1%. Although high-yielding multiparous cows showed the highest absolute KR (prob. = 13.6% [95% CI 12.5-14.8]), high-yielding primiparous cows exhibited an unexpectedly elevated KR (prob. = 11.4% [95% CI 9.9-13.1]). Elevated KR was also observed in underconditioned cows during mid-early lactation (days in milk [DIM] 30-99, prob. = 21.0% [95% CI 18.6-23.5]), and SIM cows producing high ECM yields (>35 kg/day; prob. = 19.5% [95% CI 16.2-23.4]). The highest predicted KR occurred in underconditioned, first-parity cows housed in tie stalls, lame, and producing high ECM yields during mid-early lactation, indicating that specific combinations of risk factors amplify KR beyond the sum of their individual contributions. These findings highlight the importance of modeling interactions among animal-level and environmental factors to enable context-specific risk assessment. Evaluating breed, lactation stage, body condition, production level, housing, and health status jointly may support more targeted prevention strategies, particularly during the first 99 DIM, and improve identification of cows at elevated ketosis risk.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesKetosisMilkAnimalsCattleDairyingFemaleGermanyLactationRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID42461921
PMCPMC13374898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.