ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Advancing gender equity in primary health care: Lessons from integrating gender-responsive strategies into service delivery in Ethiopia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gender inequities remain a major barrier to women's access to reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) services. To address this gap, the Improve Primary Health Care Service Delivery (IPHCSD) project integrated a set of gender-responsive strategies into primary health care (PHC) systems. This paper presents lessons from implementing gender-responsive strategies that empowered women and communities while enhancing access to essential health services. A quasi-experimental embedded implementation research with a participatory mixed-methods approach was employed. The study combined controlled before-and-after household studies, phenomenological research, gender analysis, and stakeholder engagement to identify gender-related barriers and co-design contextually appropriate interventions. A mixed-effect logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the net effect using a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach. The study identified substantial gender-related barriers to RMNCH service utilization, including restrictive social norms, high workloads for women, limited decision-making power and control over resources, and inadequate male involvement. In response, the project implemented a comprehensive gender integration strategy. This included strengthening women's participation through learning and action groups, establishing gender-sensitive service standards, and expanded home visits and targeted outreach and promoting male engagement. These strategies demonstrated strong transformative potential of enhancing women's agency and improving RMNCH service delivery and utilization. Quantitatively, the intervention significantly improved women's agency in agrarian settings (DiD: + 13.6 percentage points; p < 0.001). Uptake of maternal and newborn health services also increased significantly: DiD of +15.8 percentage points (p < 0.001) and +12.3 percentage points (p = 0.031) under the community-based MNH delivery strategy, and +29.0 (agrarian) and +15.9 (pastoral) under the PLA strategy. Gender-integrated approaches strengthened women's agency, improved access to and use of RMNCH services, and contributed to universal health coverage. Integrating gender considerations and enhancing men and youth involvement into PHC is essential for reducing disparities and building more inclusive health systems in vulnerable communities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.