ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring DNA methylation profiles in the pathogenesis of human osteoporosis via whole-genome bisulfite sequencing.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a widespread metabolic bone disorder characterized by diminished bone mass, deteriorated microarchitecture, and increased bone fragility, resulting in elevated fracture risk. This condition adversely affects quality of life and is associated with higher mortality. Growing evidence indicates that DNA methylation serves as a key epigenetic mechanism regulating bone metabolism-related gene expression and may thereby influence osteoporosis pathogenesis. However, the specific relationship between DNA methylation and osteoporosis remains to be fully elucidated. In this hypothesis‑generating pilot study, we demonstrated significant differences in both the extent and distribution of DNA methylation between osteoporosis patients and non‑osteoporosis controls, with notable enrichment in CpG islands. Enrichment analyses based on GO and KEGG pathways revealed distinct biological processes and signaling pathways associated with osteoporosis. Importantly, we identified six genes (MSX1, HOXD4, AXIN2, WNT5A, TGFB1, STAT3) showing directionally consistent methylation‑expression trends, although the DMRs for most genes were located in non‑promoter regions (TTS, exons, introns). After adjusting for the imbalance in sequencing depth, the same directional trends were retained; however, the differences did not reach adjusted statistical significance (median adjusted P > 0.05), likely due to the limited sample size. These genes therefore represent prioritized candidates for exploratory follow‑up in larger, cell‑type‑resolved cohorts. This study provides new insights into the epigenetic mechanisms underlying osteoporosis and highlights potential targets for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.