ArticlePloS one2026
Temperament, personality and decision-making accuracy in handball referees.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate decision-making is essential for effective handball officiating, yet little is known about how stable psychological traits relate to referees' decision-making accuracy. This study examined whether temperament and personality characteristics are associated with decision-making accuracy in handball referees. Forty-one officials from three competition levels (Second League, First League, Superleague) completed the FCB-TI and NEO-FFI inventories. Decision-making accuracy was assessed using a video-based test of game situations scored against expert judgments. Sensory Sensitivity showed a positive bivariate correlation with decision-making accuracy (r = 0.32, p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that competitive level accounted for 24% of the variance in decision-making accuracy (R2 = 0.24, p = 0.001). Adding Sensory Sensitivity increased the explained variance to 30%, although its unique contribution did not reach statistical significance. Activity, as a temperament trait, showed different associations with decision-making accuracy across competition levels. No significant relationships were observed between Big Five personality traits and decision-making accuracy. These findings suggest that, among the variables examined, competitive level was the main factor associated with decision-making accuracy, while selected temperament traits, particularly Sensory Sensitivity and, to a lesser extent, Activity, may also be relevant to this outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.