ArticleMedical physics2026
Optimization of flushing strategies to minimize dilution of high-concentration radiopharmaceuticals in intravenous tubing.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn precise imaging techniques such as dynamic imaging with radiopharmaceuticals, achieving a high-concentration bolus in target sites is crucial. However, dilution within infusion tubing severely compromises bolus integrity. Although pulsed flushing is clinically used to clear intravenous tubing, its efficacy in mitigating radiopharmaceutical dilution and the optimal protocol parameters remain insufficiently elucidated.
methodsThis study employed a theoretical analysis of dilution mechanisms and utilized computational fluid dynamics simulations to compare the efficacy of pulsed flushing with different volumes and frequencies, verifying its feasibility. Subsequently, in vivo rat pharmacokinetic experiments were performed to systematically assess the pulsed flushing strategy.
resultsTheoretical and computational fluid dynamics analyses indicate that while higher continuous flow rates shorten injection time, it exacerbates the "tailing" phenomenon caused by parabolic flow patterns. In contrast, a high frequency, small-volume pulsed flushing strategy generates a greater number of vortices at abrupt cross-section changes in the tubing during injection pauses, effectively clearing residual drug and thereby significantly suppressing axial dispersion of the bolus. Compared to continuous flushing, pulsed flushing demonstrates superior performance in reducing the final residual rate and controlling tailing. In vivo experiments in rats further confirmed that, compared to manual operation, the automated pulsed flushing strategy produces boluses with better morphology during the initial injection phase, exhibits greater consistency both between and within individuals, and leaves no radioactive residue at the puncture site.
conclusionHigh frequency, small-volume pulsed flushing is an effective strategy for clearing dead space and suppressing the tubing dilution effect through vortex induction, outperforming traditional manual and continuous automatic injection. Appropriate selection of pulse bolus volume parameters is the core solution for overcoming the dilution challenge in automatic bolus injection and for improving injection consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.