ArticlePloS one2026
Covid-19 related excess mortality: An analysis by age for selected countries.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasures of excess mortality are generally regarded as providing the best metric for countries' experience during the Covid pandemic of 2020-2022. Such measures, however, need to be adjusted to take account of the different age structures of different countries as Covid-related mortality can differ substantially by age.
methodsThis paper analyses excess mortality data for a selection of countries using the Short Term Mortality Fluctuations dataset. A standardised age distribution is applied to the data to obtain age-adjusted excess mortality and this is compared to crude excess mortality data. The metric of years of life lost (YLL) is also calculated for the same dataset and cluster analysis is applied to investigate relationships between the mortality metrics and GDP per capita and inequality.
resultsThe age adjustment makes a significant difference for some countries but the overall ranking of countries in terms of excess mortality changes very little, with rank correlation coefficients in excess of 0.95 for the metrics of crude mortality, age adjusted mortality and YLL Age adjusted excess mortality has a rank correlation of -0.69 with GDP per capita but the rank correlation with the Gini coefficient of 0.11 is not statistically significant.
conclusionsRankings of countries by excess mortality during the Covid period are robust to age adjustment and choice of mortality metric. Cluster analysis suggests distinct clusterings of countries with similar outcomes, particularly the former planned economies of central and eastern Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.