Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42461836›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Exploring the relationship between supervisory support, self-efficacy, and satisfaction among nursing students in Saudi Arabia.

Thurayya Eid, Faihan F Alshaibany, Abdulaziz M Alodhailah, Waleed M Alshehri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thurayya EidDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3613-1099
Faihan F AlshaibanyDepartment of Nursing Administration and Education, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz M AlodhailahDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1643-2599
Waleed M AlshehriDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupervisory support during clinical placements is central to nursing students' professional development. Professional self-efficacy, students' confidence in performing clinical tasks, is increasingly recognised as a key outcome associated with transition to practice and workforce retention. In Saudi Arabia, Vision 2030 healthcare reforms have intensified demand for qualified nurses, making the quality of clinical supervision a strategic priority. This study examined the relationships among supervisory support, professional self-efficacy, and nursing student satisfaction at King Saud University-affiliated hospitals.

methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 145 nursing students (second-, third-, and fourth-year bachelor's degree students) at three King Saud University-affiliated teaching hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling based on year of study. Data were collected using four validated instruments: a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Supervisory Support Scale (9 items; Cronbach's α = 0.90), the Nursing Student Satisfaction Scale (6 items; α = 0.88), and an adapted Professional Self-Efficacy Scale (12 items; α = 0.90). Descriptive statistics summarised the three key study variables (supervisory support, professional self-efficacy, and student satisfaction) alongside sociodemographic characteristics. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed the strength and direction of linear associations among continuous study variables. Formal mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro (Model 4) with 5,000 bias-corrected bootstrap resampling iterations.

resultsOf 175 students approached and meeting eligibility criteria, 145 returned valid questionnaires (response rate = 82.9%). The sample was predominantly female (60.7%) and in the age range of 20-22 years (66.9%). Students reported high levels of supervisory support (mean = 4.10 ± 0.53 out of 5), satisfaction with clinical placements (mean = 4.11 ± 0.52), and professional self-efficacy (mean = 4.06 ± 0.56). Supervisory support was strongly correlated with satisfaction (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) and professional self-efficacy (r = 0.57, p < 0.001); professional self-efficacy was positively correlated with satisfaction (r = 0.49, p < 0.001Statistical mediation analysis revealed that professional self-efficacy partially mediated the supervisory support-satisfaction relationship: the indirect association (ab = 0.13, 95% CI [0.07, 0.19]) was statistically significant and accounted for approximately 19% of the total association. In regression analysis, supervisory support remained significantly associated with satisfaction (β = 0.43, p < 0.001) even after accounting for professional self-efficacy, consistent with partial statistical mediation.

conclusionsSupervisory support was significantly and positively associated with nursing students' satisfaction and professional self-efficacy. These findings, grounded in social cognitive theory, suggest that high-quality supervision may enhance clinical learning outcomes both directly and through strengthening students' professional confidence. Standardising supervisory practices, investing in supervisor training, and creating structured feedback mechanisms are priorities for improving nursing education in Saudi Arabia and advancing national nursing workforce goals under Vision 2030.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionSelf EfficacyStudents, NursingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42461836
PMCPMC13375050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.