ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Test-fairness deep learning with influence score.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Performance disparities in AI systems can manifest across sensitive groups or across data sources, especially when training data are collected from specific populations. In this work, we propose a feature-selection-based method that improves test-fairness while preserving prediction performance. Built on deep learning models, the proposed approach adopts the influence score (I-score), a statistical measure that captures interaction effects among multiple features. We identify features strongly associated with dataset membership by training an auxiliary model to predict dataset origin and applying I-score-based subset selection; these dataset-associated features are then excluded (masked) from the original prediction model for follow-up inference. We conduct experiments on two skin lesion datasets, ISIC 2019 and ASAN, collected from different populations. The empirical results show that the resulting fair I-score model can maintain high classification performance for skin lesion prediction while reducing cross-dataset subgroup performance disparity under our test-fairness evaluation setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.