ArticlePloS one2026
Associated factors of myopia in a Portuguese sample of adolescents: Parental history and school-related lifestyle.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the interaction between parental myopia and school-related lifestyle patterns, and myopia in a sample of Portuguese adolescents. Based on previously reported data, we examined whether environmental and behavioural correlates traditionally associated with myopia, such as outdoor time, physical activity practice, screen time, and academic load, maintain their significance in a non-metropolitan European context.
methodsThis analysis involved a sample of 874 adolescents (10-18 years). Myopia was measured using non-cycloplegic open-field autorefraction and defined as a spherical equivalent ≤ -0.50D in the worse eye. Potential factors correlated with myopia were collected through supervised questionnaires completed by students and parents. Data were analysed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression to identify independent associations adjusting for demographic and behavioural covariates.
resultsThe prevalence rate of myopia was 22.5%. The multivariable model identified family history of myopia as the strongest association (OR up to 3.75; CI:2.03-6.95; p < 0.001). Attending a higher school level (OR=2.20; CI:1.07-4.52; p = 0.032) and schools in urban locations (OR=1.59; CI:1.00-2.50; p = 0.048) showed a significant association. Regarding lifestyle, regular physical activity (≥ 2 times per week) was associated with odds of myopia (OR=0.47; CI:0.29-0.77; p = 0.003) even after adjustment for parental history of myopia. Although included in the fully adjusted model, factors such as smartphone use and breastfeeding did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05).
conclusionsDespite the low population-density environment in this region, myopia prevalence was comparable to that reported in other European studies. The identified associations suggest that both parental history and school-related lifestyle factors should be considered when interpreting myopia patterns in adolescence. These findings may help inform school-based strategies aimed at promoting healthier visual and behavioural habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.