ArticlePLoS genetics2026
A genomic-led strategy to anticipate drug safety effects.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safety-related issues account for approximately 25% of failures in new drug discovery programs. On top of that, many are discovered during post-marketing surveillance, significantly limiting drug utility and application. To proactively address these concerns, we developed a genetics-led strategy leveraging Mendelian Randomization (MR) across large-scale genetic datasets from the Million Veteran Program, FinnGen, and UK Biobank. By mapping genetic variants associated with gene expression and protein abundance to 1,449 harmonized human phenotypes, we systematically identified potential adverse drug reactions (ADR). Our extensive MR analysis, encompassing 16,915 protein-coding genes, demonstrated the capacity to predict hundreds of known ADR for approved medications, with approximately 40% corroborated by FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data. Additionally, we found significant enrichment of identified gene-mechanism pairs in clinical trials terminated early due to safety concerns, highlighting the clinical utility of genetics-informed safety prediction. Notably, immune-related pathways were prominently associated with ADR, indicating particular sensitivity within immune modulation targets. Our comprehensive atlas, integrating genetic evidence with pharmacological mechanisms, provides a robust predictive framework for anticipating drug safety, potentially enhancing decision-making in drug development and pharmacovigilance. An interactive web interface allowing filtering by gene, phenotype, drug phase, and mechanism of action is available at https://shiny.parse-health.org/safety/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.