Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42461783›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Machine learning-driven integration of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and its variability.

Evangelos Ntalianis, Everton Jose Santana, Nicholas Cauwenberghs, Veronique Cornelissen, Tatiana Kuznetsova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evangelos NtalianisDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3544-6526
Everton Jose SantanaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nicholas CauwenberghsDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-7692
Veronique CornelissenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Rehabilitation in Internal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tatiana KuznetsovaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-4576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (24-hour ABPM) is considered the best out-of-office BP measurement to assess hypertension. Yet, the complexity of the obtained data, hinders their interpretation. Therefore, in this study, we investigated whether a clustering algorithm could facilitate the integrative interpretation of 24-hour ambulatory BP and its variability to construct distinctive clusters associated with cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. In 1344 community-dwelling individuals (mean age, 46.9 years; 50.6% women), we acquired 24-hour ABPM recordings, clinical data at baseline and we collected adverse outcomes (median follow-up time 19.4 years). We used dynamic time warping combined with the k-medoids clustering algorithm on the heart rate, systolic and diastolic BP recordings. Clinical characteristics and CV outcome were used to evaluate the validity of the derived clusters using the original cohort, while an external general population cohort (n = 1219) was used for further validation. We separated the dataset into 4 clusters. Cluster 1 showed the most favourable CV risk profile comprising younger individuals with the lowest 24-hour ABPM patterns. On the contrary, cluster 4 revealed the worst CV profile with older participants, higher office and 24-hour ABPM, higher medication intake and the highest BP variability. After adjusting for traditional risk factors, including office systolic BP cluster 4 had significantly higher risk of adverse CV events compared to cluster 1 (HR: 1.63; 95%CI:1.15-2.32; P = 0.006). Similar findings were made in the external validation cohort. Time series clustering of ABPM recordings may facilitate the integrative interpretation of 24-hour ambulatory BP and BP variability.

Identifiers

PMID42461783
PMCPMC13374967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.