Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42461763›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Environmental phylogenetics supports a steady diversification of crown eukaryotes starting from the mid-Proterozoic.

Miguel M Sandin, Phoebe A Cohen, Hélène Morlon, Fabien Burki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Environmental phylogenetics supports a steady diversification of crown eukaryotes starting from the mid-Proterozoic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Divergent evolution of the PRPS enzymes across the tree of life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miguel M SandinDepartment of Organismal Biology, Program in Systematic Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75 236, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-7613
Phoebe A CohenDepartment of Geosciences, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267.ORCID 0000-0001-5517-1577
Hélène MorlonInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-7521
Fabien BurkiDepartment of Organismal Biology, Program in Systematic Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75 236, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8248-8462

Funding

EC | Horizon Europe | Excellent Science | HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) 101103530European Research Council 101044505Generalitat de Catalunya (Government of Catalonia) 2021BP00068Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular clock and preservation of early microfossil assemblages suggest that eukaryotes were present and already diverse more than ~1600 million years ago (Ma). Yet, the earliest identifiable eukaryotic crown group fossil only appeared around 1050 Ma, leaving a ~600 My gap in the Mesoproterozoic during which the evolution and diversification of early eukaryotes remain poorly understood. Here, we infer a timeline of eukaryote evolution using molecular clock and birth-death diversification models, including the large diversity of environmental sequences to take into account the uncultured majority of microbial life. Our analyses, based on a unique dataset of 75,975 nonredundant Operational Taxonomic Units and 77 well-supported fossil calibrations, indicate a steady diversification of crown group eukaryotes during the Proterozoic after the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor. We show that Archaeplastida was one of the earliest diversifying supergroups and the most diverse throughout the Proterozoic, suggesting that the first successful plastid endosymbiosis gave Archaeplastida a measurable evolutionary advantage. Discoba, Amoebozoa, and Rhizaria followed Archaeplastida in phylogenetic diversity throughout the Proterozoic, indicating that crown eukaryotes were already thriving in this Era. These results contrast with the common view that the geologically stable Proterozoic Era experienced little eukaryotic evolutionary innovation and indicate that all current supergroups were already established in the Mesoproterozoic.

Indexed as

EukaryotaFossilsPhylogenyBiodiversityBiological EvolutionEvolution, Moleculardiversificationmacroevolutionmetabarcodingmolecular clockpaleobiodiversity

Identifiers

PMID42461763
PMCPMC13389600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.