Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42461686›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Scalable medium-density genotyping platforms for cultivar identification, pedigree authentication, marker-assisted and genomic selection, and other applications in strawberry.

Dominique D A Pincot, Joshua A Sleper, Randi A Famula, Cindy M Lopéz, Dianne Velasco, Maher Al Rwahnih, Allison Krill-Brown, Vance M Whitaker, Steven J Knapp, Mitchell J Feldmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dominique D A PincotDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6463-1213
Joshua A SleperHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Wimauma, Florida, 33598, United States.
Randi A FamulaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8490-1989
Cindy M LopézDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, United States.
Dianne VelascoFoundation Plant Services, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, United States.
Maher Al RwahnihFoundation Plant Services, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-9234
Allison Krill-BrownDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, United States.
Vance M WhitakerHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Wimauma, Florida, 33598, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-3019
Steven J KnappDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6498-5409
Mitchell J FeldmannDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7257-3401

Funding

California Strawberry CommissionFlorida Strawberry Research and Education FoundationUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Specialty Crops Research Initiative #2022-51181-38328USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative #2024-67013-42591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A broad spectrum of high-density genotyping approaches, including single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, genotyping-by-sequencing, and whole-genome reduced-representation sequencing, have been shown to perform well in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa), despite the inherent complexity of the octoploid genome. While these approaches are effective, their routine deployment in breeding programs can be constrained by cost, computational requirements, and workflow complexity. In parallel, many breeding programs continue to rely on locus-specific assays for marker-assisted selection, resulting in fragmented and inefficient genotyping strategies. Here, we describe medium-density amplicon-based genotyping platforms for strawberry designed to provide cost-effective, turnkey solutions that integrate markers used for marker-assisted selection with genome-wide markers suitable for genomic prediction in a single laboratory assay. These platforms were developed by targeting 1,650 or 4,811 target SNPs via amplicon sequencing, and are interoperable with existing high-density genotyping resources, including a widely used 50K SNP array, thereby facilitating data integration across platforms. We benchmarked their performance relative to the 50K SNP array across breeding-relevant applications, including identity and purity testing, pedigree authentication, marker-assisted selection, and genomic selection, and further evaluated the feasibility of genotype imputation to enhance genome-wide information content. Across analyses, the 1,650- and 4,811-amplicon platforms produced results comparable to higher-density platforms while substantially reducing genotyping cost and analytical overhead. This work demonstrates that targeted amplicon-based genotyping can support efficient, scalable, and integrated genome-informed breeding, enabling the routine application of both marker-assisted and genomic selection within strawberry breeding workflows. Open-source R workflows are provided to support streamlined analyses in breeding contexts.

Indexed as

FragariaGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotyping TechniquesGenetic MarkersGenotypePedigreePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic MarkersAgriSeqFragaria × ananassagenomic evaluationgenotyping

Identifiers

PMID42461686
PMCPMC13535441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.