ArticleJAMA network open2026
Clinical Digital Health Engagement and Psychological Distress Among Adults.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Digital health technologies are increasingly integrated into clinical care, but their psychological correlates remain unclear. Objective: To examine whether digital health engagement within clinical care systems is associated with psychological distress among US adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study using data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized US adults. Data were analyzed from January 2026 to May 2026. Data from multiple cycles of the HINTS, including HINTS 5 (2017-2020), HINTS 6 (2022), and HINTS 7 (2024), were pooled. The analytic sample included 23 682 individuals. Exposure: Digital health engagement measured using a composite index capturing electronic communication with a health care practitioner, viewing laboratory or test results online, accessing an online medical record or patient portal, use of health or wellness mobile applications, and electronically transmitting health information from a device or application to a health professional. Main Outcomes and Measures: Psychological distress measured using the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4), a validated scale ranging from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress. Results: The analytic sample included 23 682 individuals. The mean (SD) age was 55 (17) years, digital engagement score was 0.4 (0.3), and the PHQ-4 score was 2.0 (2.8). Overall, 13 855 (59%) of respondents were female; 3940 (17%) were Hispanic, 1161 (4.9%) were non-Hispanic Asian, 3333 (14%) were non-Hispanic Black, 14 402 (61%) were non-Hispanic White, and 846 (3.6%) identified as non-Hispanic other. In survey-weighted regression models, higher digital engagement was associated with higher psychological distress (β = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.75; P < .001). Exploratory generalized additive models suggested nonlinearity in the association, although it remained positive across the observed range of engagement. Similar associations were observed among respondents reporting excellent, very good, or good health. Associations were strongest for active digital behaviors, including electronic communication with clinicians and use of health-related mobile applications. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US adults using data from the HINTS, higher digital health engagement was associated with modestly higher psychological distress. Engagement patterns may reflect not only patient activation but also underlying psychological distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.