ArticleEnvironmental management2026
Factors Supporting Translational, Participatory Ecology Projects-Observations from Ten Years of Collaborative Research on Invasive Fish.
Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Translational participatory research for environmental management occupies a demanding space at the interface of societal needs and academic research. Projects in this space usually face the challenge of reconciling stakeholder involvement and real-world applicability with academic career requirements such as excellence in fundamental research and the attraction of substantial research funds. Here, we share our experiences from a 12-year translational participatory research initiative on the management of invasive gobies in central Europe. We describe the project, synthesize inputs, outputs, and outcomes, and summarize conditions and practices across political, administrative, societal, institutional, team, and individual levels that we found important and beneficial in our attempts to produce both academic and applied outcomes. Our impression is that an interaction of factors across these levels created windows of opportunity, and that the team constellation and setting allowed us to seize these opportunities for the sake of both scientific progress and societal impact. By reflecting from the perspective of a multidisciplinary group of natural scientists directly engaged in such a project, we aim to contribute a personal account to social science frameworks on translational, participatory, inter- and transdisciplinary research. Our retrospective potentially can inform policy makers, funders, and institutions who seek to create enabling environments for interface research, and is helpful to fellow natural scientists who want to prepare the ground for their own translational participatory research initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.