ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Development and analysis of a SmPC-based machine-readable dataset of contraindications for clinical decision support and real-world data analysis.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUnrecognized contraindications pose risks for adverse drug reactions, hospitalizations or death. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) aim to mitigate medication-related harm, particularly originating from contraindications. However, many CDSS provide limited benefit, as they focus largely on singular risk situations such as drug-drug interactions and often generate alerts of limited clinical relevance. Comprehensive integration of contraindications into CDSS may support more clinically meaningful alerts. The aim of this work was the development and analysis of machine-readable contraindication lists, including drug-clinical condition, drug-kidney function and drug-drug (group) contraindications, for integration into CDSS and real-world data analysis.
methodsWe extracted and operationalized contraindications, based on Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs), of the 688 most prescribed drugs in Germany, leveraging common medical coding systems. Moreover, we analyzed extracted contraindications based on operationalizability, overall frequency and frequencies within different contraindication categories.
resultsIn total, we extracted 4676 contraindications, of which 2129 (45.5%) were deemed operationalizable. Of these 2129 contraindications, 1652 (77.6%) were attributed to drug-clinical condition, 83 (3.9%) to drug-kidney, 140 (6.6%) to drug-drug group and 254 (11.9%) to drug-drug. The most frequently mentioned contraindicated risk situations were 'severe liver insufficiency' (n = 74, 3.5%), 'pregnancy' (n = 66, 3.1%), 'MAO-inhibitors' (n = 44, 2.1%), and 'shock' (n = 44, 2.1%).
conclusionOur results show, that drug-clinical condition contraindications are listed far more frequently in SmPCs than other contraindication categories. Focusing on clinical condition-related contraindications within CDSS could improve the detection of clinically relevant contraindications in routine data and enhance medication safety. The clinical applicability is currently being evaluated in the INTERPOLAR study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.