Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42461420›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2026

Decoding the Applications of Microbial Metabolites: Insights into the Antibacterial Potential of Lactobacillus acidophilus Postbiotics.

Seyed Sadeq Mousavi Ghahfarrokhi, Bibi Sedigheh Fazly Bazzaz, Neda Nazari, Amir Reza Mollazadeh, Zahra Faraji, Bagher Amirheidari, Neshaut Mashreghi Mohammadi, Zahra Sabeti, Iman Iranmanesh, Bahman Khameneh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seyed Sadeq Mousavi GhahfarrokhiPharmaceutical Quality Assurance Research Center, The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bibi Sedigheh Fazly BazzazBiotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Neda NazariSchool of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Amir Reza MollazadehSchool of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Zahra FarajiSchool of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Bagher AmirheidariPharmaceutical Sciences and Cosmetic Products Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Neshaut Mashreghi MohammadiDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra SabetiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Control, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Iman IranmaneshDepartment of Drug and Food Control, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bahman KhamenehDepartment of Pharmaceutical Control, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. khamenehbagherib@mums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-7667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postbiotics, bioactive metabolites produced by probiotic bacteria, have garnered attention for their diverse health benefits, particularly their antimicrobial properties. This study evaluates the antibacterial efficacy of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), selecting Lactobacillus acidophilus postbiotics as the most effective against various pathogenic microorganisms, and focusing on their potential use in topical formulations. In vitro assays were conducted to assess their antimicrobial activity, including minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), well diffusion assay, antibiofilm activity, preservative effectiveness testing, and time-kill assay. The L. acidophilus postbiotic, was identified and quantified by a validated HPLC method, effectively inhibited the growth of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Aspergillus niger. Furthermore, the formulation containing postbiotics exhibited self-preservative properties. The study also highlights distinct antibacterial effects against Corynebacterium acnes in supernatant, lyophilized, and spray-dried models, with the lyophilized form exhibiting the greatest antimicrobial activity. Based on these results, L. acidophilus postbiotics are a promising candidate for topical applications. They may serve as supportive or complementary components to existing antibiotics and preservative systems, pending further validation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsLactobacillus acidophilusProbioticsBacteriaBiofilmsCandida albicansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.