Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42461396›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry2026

Geometry, spin coupling, and dielectric control of redox potentials in [4Fe-4S] Clusters.

Peter S Rice, Bruno Jacob, Khushbu Agarwal, Marcel D Baer, Simone Raugei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter S RicePhysical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Bruno JacobPhysical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Khushbu AgarwalPhysical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Marcel D BaerPhysical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Simone RaugeiPhysical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA. simone.raugei@pnnl.gov.

Funding

U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Physical Biosciences Program under awards FWP 66476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron-sulfur (Fe-S) clusters are common biological cofactors that facilitate vital redox reactions. Despite extensive research, the molecular basis of redox potential tuning in ferredoxin-like proteins remains an active area of debate. In this study, we combine statistical analysis of over one thousand [4Fe-4S]-containing protein structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with broken-symmetry and extended broken-symmetry density functional theory to examine how cysteine ligand orientations and environmental screening affect redox properties of the clusters. We identified five main ligand configurations, three of which are predominant in natural structures. Among these, the adiabatic electron affinity differs by less than 0.1 V, indicating that, while geometry plays a secondary role, it allows localized fine-tuning of redox properties. In contrast, electrostatic and solvation effects primarily determine the overall potential range.

Indexed as

Iron-Sulfur ProteinsDensity Functional TheoryModels, MolecularOxidation-ReductionStatic ElectricityIron-Sulfur Proteins[4Fe-4S] ClustersComputational ChemistryRedox PotentialRedox Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.