ArticleCJEM2026
PHONE-CONNECT: a pilot of phone distribution for marginalized ED patients.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe shift to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic worsened digital health disparities, particularly for people experiencing homelessness who lack access to mobile devices. This pilot evaluation was designed to assess the preliminary impact of a novel emergency department (ED)-based phone distribution program.
methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods observational pre-post-study evaluating the impact of a mobile phone distribution program at two urban EDs in Toronto, Canada, from November 2019 to May 2022. The quantitative component consisted of a retrospective cohort analysis of 309 patients, comparing healthcare utilization three months before and three months after phone distribution. The qualitative component involved 12 semi-structured interviews exploring participant experiences. The primary outcome was attendance at scheduled specialist appointments and the secondary outcome was ED utilization.
resultsAmong the 309 participants, 67.6% were unhoused, and 50.8% had chronic health conditions. There was no significant change in the overall number of ED visits after phone distribution when comparing three months pre-intervention to three months post-intervention. However, the proportion of mental health-related ED visits significantly decreased post-intervention, while the proportion of visits for physical health concerns increased. Among those connected to intensive case management, no-show rates for appointments were significantly lower in the case management group compared to the non-case management group. Younger patients (≤ 44 years) had lower cancelation rates post-intervention. Qualitative findings of patient interviews revealed three benefits: improved health ownership, increased ability managing daily life and future planning, and strengthened social connections.
conclusionsAn ED-based phone distribution program may improve healthcare access and social inclusion among digitally excluded patients. Pairing phone distribution with case management can enhance impact. Increasing access to mobile phones should be considered in improving equitable access to healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42461370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.