Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42461349›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026

Integrated Specialty Care: A Review of the Current State.

Laurie C Ivey, Anne-Stuart Bell, Mary Taylor Goeltz, Emma Gilchrist

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laurie C IveyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Anschutz, 1890 N. Revere Ct, Ste 5003, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Laurie.ivey@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9306-4104
Anne-Stuart BellDepartment of Family Medicine Eugene S. Farley, Jr. Health Policy Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-9813-5214
Mary Taylor GoeltzEugene S. Farley, Jr. Health Policy Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5809-5493
Emma GilchristEugene S. Farley, Jr. Health Policy Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-3772-4220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe paper reviews the integrated specialty care literature from the past 5 years, summarizes themes, and highlights next steps for continuing to move the field forward. RECENT

findingsForty-six articles have been written on integrated specialty care in the last 5 years. People are using generic integration principles, adapting primary care models, and outlining new adaptations and frameworks for their specialty settings. Providers continue to find integration important to their practice and their professional satisfaction. Positive impacts continue to be made on patient outcomes, including prevention. There is some evidence for decreases in utilization. Barriers continue with respect to reimbursement and financial support. Integrating behavioral health (BH) into specialty care is a beneficial endeavor for providers and patients alike. New trends in integration continue to emerge as additional specialty practices integrate. Reducing financial barriers while engaging in efforts to build a competent BH workforce are imperatives.

Indexed as

Behavioral MedicineDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedMental Health ServicesHumansBehavioral healthIntegrated behavioral healthIntegrated specialty behavioral healthIntegrated specialty careIntegrationSpecialty medicine

Identifiers

PMID42461349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.