ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Preoperative CT Assessment of Portal Vein Contact Length Predicts Poor Prognosis in Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based tumor-portal/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) contact angle and contact length predict pathological venous invasion and refine prognostic stratification in anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who underwent upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic head PDAC, including 101 anatomically resectable cases and 7 borderline resectable cases with PV involvement (BR-PV). Tumor-PV/SMV contact angle and contact length were measured on multidetector CT. Their associations with pathological PV/SMV invasion, PV/SMV resection, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
resultsBoth contact angle and contact length predicted pathological venous invasion, with optimal cutoff values of 90° for angle (AUC = 0.86) and 15 mm for length (AUC = 0.84), and both were significantly associated with pathological venous invasion and PV/SMV resection (all p < 0.001). In the subgroup with R-PDAC, however, only contact length provided meaningful prognostic stratification. Patients with contact length ≥ 15 mm had significantly worse OS than those with contact length < 15 mm (p = 0.0032) or no contact (p < 0.001), and their survival was comparable to that of BR-PV patients (p = 0.8548). In multivariable analysis, contact length ≥ 15 mm remained an independent adverse prognostic factor (HR 2.79, 95% CI 1.64-4.73, p < 0.001).
conclusionPreoperative CT-based assessment of tumor-PV/SMV contact length may serve as a practical marker for identifying a high-risk subgroup within R-PDAC and may help refine selection of patients for neoadjuvant treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42461335What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.